| Title |
Fast Image Inpainting Based on Coherence Transport
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, August 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10851-007-0017-6 |
| Authors |
Folkmar Bornemann, Tom März |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | 3% |
| France | 3 | 3% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 99 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
| Professor | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 15% |
| Unknown | 15 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 43 | 39% |
| Engineering | 29 | 26% |
| Mathematics | 9 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 3% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 20 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2018.
All research outputs
#4,778,877
of 23,106,934 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision
#19
of 303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,457
of 69,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,934 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 303 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them