| Title |
Matroids and the greedy algorithm
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Mathematical Programming, December 1971
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf01584082 |
| Authors |
Jack Edmonds |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 104 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 25% |
| Researcher | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 16% |
| Unknown | 27 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 36 | 33% |
| Mathematics | 17 | 16% |
| Engineering | 7 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 36 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2024.
All research outputs
#4,778,877
of 23,106,934 outputs
Outputs from Mathematical Programming
#49
of 677 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#728
of 16,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mathematical Programming
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,934 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 677 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 16,854 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them