↓ Skip to main content

Use of digital image processing in the monitoring of deformations in building structures

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Use of digital image processing in the monitoring of deformations in building structures
Published in
Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring, September 2014
DOI 10.1007/s13349-014-0091-6
Authors

Klaudius Henke, Robert Pawlowski, Peter Schregle, Stefan Winter

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 38 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 26%
Student > Master 7 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Researcher 4 10%
Lecturer 3 8%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 7 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 25 64%
Computer Science 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 8 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2018.
All research outputs
#7,577,096
of 23,106,934 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring
#12
of 52 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,886
of 251,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,934 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 52 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,472 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.