| Title |
Bond breaking in stretched molecules: multi-reference methods versus density functional theory
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Theoretical Chemistry Accounts, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00214-016-1822-z |
| Authors |
Gary S. Kedziora, Stephen A. Barr, Rajiv Berry, James C. Moller, Timothy D. Breitzman |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Romania | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 48 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 24% |
| Professor | 6 | 12% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 9 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 27 | 54% |
| Materials Science | 3 | 6% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 4% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Psychology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 10 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2021.
All research outputs
#4,968,506
of 23,806,312 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical Chemistry Accounts
#59
of 581 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,955
of 300,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical Chemistry Accounts
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,806,312 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 581 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,356 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.