↓ Skip to main content

A statistical approach to calibrating the scores of biased reviewers of scientific papers

Overview of attention for article published in Metrika, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
A statistical approach to calibrating the scores of biased reviewers of scientific papers
Published in
Metrika, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00184-015-0542-z
Authors

Wiltrud Kuhlisch, Magnus Roos, Jörg Rothe, Joachim Rudolph, Björn Scheuermann, Dietrich Stoyan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 30%
Researcher 2 20%
Other 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Professor 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 2 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 10%
Mathematics 1 10%
Psychology 1 10%
Sports and Recreations 1 10%
Other 2 20%
Unknown 2 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2022.
All research outputs
#4,761,657
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from Metrika
#2
of 86 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,576
of 265,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Metrika
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 86 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,604 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them