You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Global Consensus Recommendations on Prevention and Management of Nutritional Rickets
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JCEM, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1210/jc.2015-2175 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Craig F Munns, Nick Shaw, Mairead Kiely, Bonny L Specker, Tom D Thacher, Keiichi Ozono, Toshimi Michigami, Dov Tiosano, M Zulf Mughal, Outi Mäkitie, Lorna Ramos-Abad, Leanne Ward, Linda A DiMeglio, Navoda Atapattu, Hamilton Cassinelli, Christian Braegger, John M Pettifor, Anju Seth, Hafsatu Wasagu Idris, Vijayalakshmi Bhatia, Junfen Fu, Gail Goldberg, Lars Sävendahl, Rajesh Khadgawat, Pawel Pludowski, Jane Maddock, Elina Hyppönen, Abiola Oduwole, Emma Frew, Magda Aguiar, Ted Tulchinsky, Gary Butler, Wolfgang Högler |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 6 | 30% |
| Japan | 2 | 10% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Colombia | 1 | 5% |
| Norway | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| India | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 85% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 718 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 716 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 77 | 11% |
| Researcher | 63 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 59 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 57 | 8% |
| Other | 53 | 7% |
| Other | 160 | 22% |
| Unknown | 249 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 241 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 49 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 39 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 33 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 2% |
| Other | 75 | 10% |
| Unknown | 267 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2023.
All research outputs
#904,525
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from JCEM
#702
of 16,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,574
of 405,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JCEM
#9
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,089 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,378 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.