↓ Skip to main content

Requirements for empirical immunogenicity trials, rather than structure-based design, for developing an effective HIV vaccine

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Virology, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

patent
5 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Requirements for empirical immunogenicity trials, rather than structure-based design, for developing an effective HIV vaccine
Published in
Archives of Virology, October 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00705-011-1145-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marc H. V. Van Regenmortel

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
United States 1 4%
Unknown 25 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 26%
Student > Master 5 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 19%
Other 3 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 11%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 52%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 11%
Engineering 2 7%
Unknown 2 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2020.
All research outputs
#7,577,096
of 23,106,934 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Virology
#936
of 4,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,110
of 140,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Virology
#7
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,934 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,219 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 140,427 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.