↓ Skip to main content

Direct oral anticoagulants: a review of common medication errors

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
Title
Direct oral anticoagulants: a review of common medication errors
Published in
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, October 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11239-018-1752-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Drakeria Barr, Quovadis J. Epps

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Other 5 9%
Student > Master 4 7%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 22 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 30%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Neuroscience 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 26 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2018.
All research outputs
#13,110,969
of 23,106,934 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis
#527
of 995 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,519
of 346,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis
#9
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,934 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 995 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,599 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.