| Title |
Evaluation of RIP1K and RIP3K expressions in the malignant and benign breast tumors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Tumor Biology, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13277-015-4762-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fatemeh Karami-Tehrani, Amin Rahimi Malek, Zahra Shahsavari, Morteza Atri |
| Abstract |
Receptor-interacting protein kinase 1 (RIP1K) and RIP3K belong to RIPK family, which regulate cell survival and cell death. In the present investigation, the expression levels of RIP1K and RIP3K were evaluated in the 30 malignant, 15 benign, and 20 normal breast tissues, and their correlation with clinicopathological characteristics was also studied. The expression levels of RIP1K and RIP3K were determined, by western blot analysis. The relative RIP1K expression was significantly higher in the malignant and benign tumors when compared to those of normal tissues (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.001, respectively). However, the expression level of RIP3K was significantly lower in the malignant tumors than those of normal and benign values (P < 0.001 and P < 0.01, respectively). Positive significant correlation was found for RIP1K expression with tumor size (P < 0.001), grades (P < 0.0001), and c-erbB2 (P < 0.001), but negative significant correlation was detected with patient's age (P < 0.001), estrogen receptor (ER) (P < 0.001), progesterone receptor (PR) (P < 0.01), and P53 (P<0.01) status. RIP3K expression was significantly lower in the pre-menopauses (P < 0.01), grade III (P < 0.05), ER-negative (P < 0.05), and c-erbB2-negative malignant tumors, but no correlation was detected with tumor size, PR, and P53 status. No significant correlation was observed for RIP1K and RIP3K expressions with Ki67 and Her2. Based on the present results, it is concluded that reduction of RIP3K expression in the malignant breast tumor might be an important evidence to support the antitumor activity of this enzyme in vivo. However, RIP1K expression was shown to be higher in the malignant breast tumors than those of normal and benign breast tissues, which probably designates as a poor prognostic factor. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
| Researcher | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 14% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2016.
All research outputs
#20,300,248
of 22,837,982 outputs
Outputs from Tumor Biology
#1,834
of 2,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#330,760
of 393,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tumor Biology
#177
of 278 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,837,982 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,622 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 278 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.