| Title |
Overestimation of risk ratios by odds ratios in trials and cohort studies: alternatives to logistic regression
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, December 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.101715 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mirjam J Knol, Saskia Le Cessie, Ale Algra, Jan P Vandenbroucke, Rolf H H Groenwold |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 28% |
| France | 2 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 5% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 15 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 53% |
| Scientists | 14 | 35% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 295 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Iceland | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 287 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 72 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 48 | 16% |
| Researcher | 39 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 46 | 16% |
| Unknown | 58 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 116 | 39% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 19 | 6% |
| Psychology | 13 | 4% |
| Mathematics | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 45 | 15% |
| Unknown | 73 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,272,744
of 25,323,244 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#1,708
of 9,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,902
of 254,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#23
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,323,244 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,411 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,771 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.