You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The Interplay of Dental Pulp Stem Cells and Endothelial Cells in an Injectable Peptide Hydrogel on Angiogenesis and Pulp Regeneration In Vivo
|
---|---|
Published in |
Tissue Engineering: Part A, October 2014
|
DOI | 10.1089/ten.tea.2014.0154 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Waruna Lakmal Dissanayaka, Kenneth M. Hargreaves, Lijian Jin, Lakshman P. Samaranayake, Chengfei Zhang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 145 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 27 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 16% |
Researcher | 16 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
Other | 20 | 14% |
Unknown | 37 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 36% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 7% |
Engineering | 7 | 5% |
Materials Science | 5 | 3% |
Other | 13 | 9% |
Unknown | 46 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2022.
All research outputs
#5,448,088
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Tissue Engineering: Part A
#294
of 1,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,898
of 268,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tissue Engineering: Part A
#7
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,842 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.