↓ Skip to main content

The importance of magnesium in critically ill patients: a role in mitigating neurological injury and in the prevention of vasospasms

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, May 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
The importance of magnesium in critically ill patients: a role in mitigating neurological injury and in the prevention of vasospasms
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, May 2003
DOI 10.1007/s00134-003-1787-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kees H. Polderman, Arthur R. H. van Zanten, Armand R. J. Girbes

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 7%
Unknown 14 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 20%
Student > Postgraduate 3 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 3 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 53%
Psychology 2 13%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 7%
Unknown 4 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2018.
All research outputs
#7,577,096
of 23,106,934 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,883
of 5,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,933
of 50,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#12
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,934 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,031 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 50,648 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.