↓ Skip to main content

Exploring Retrospective Biases in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: an Experience-Sampling Study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Exploring Retrospective Biases in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: an Experience-Sampling Study
Published in
Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science, October 2018
DOI 10.1007/s41347-018-0078-y
Authors

J. MacLaren Kelly, Sarah J. Kertz, Ryan Simpson, Michael H. Bloch, Christopher Pittenger

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 25%
Unspecified 1 13%
Researcher 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 3 38%
Computer Science 1 13%
Unspecified 1 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 13%
Neuroscience 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2018.
All research outputs
#5,992,577
of 23,630,563 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,184
of 349,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,630,563 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,608 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them