| Title |
Decomposing Global Light Transport Using Time of Flight Imaging
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Computer Vision, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11263-013-0668-2 |
| Authors |
Di Wu, Andreas Velten, Matthew O’Toole, Belen Masia, Amit Agrawal, Qionghai Dai, Ramesh Raskar |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Austria | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 65 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 27% |
| Researcher | 14 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 14 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 32 | 45% |
| Engineering | 16 | 23% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 5 | 7% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 17 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2018.
All research outputs
#7,577,096
of 23,106,934 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Computer Vision
#398
of 1,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,608
of 213,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Computer Vision
#9
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,934 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,170 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,906 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.