| Title |
Automated computer-aided stenosis detection at coronary CT angiography: initial experience
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Radiology, November 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00330-009-1644-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elisabeth Arnoldi, Mulugeta Gebregziabher, U. Joseph Schoepf, Roman Goldenberg, Luis Ramos-Duran, Peter L. Zwerner, Konstantin Nikolaou, Maximilian F. Reiser, Philip Costello, Christian Thilo |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 54 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 22% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 18% |
| Unknown | 16 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 36% |
| Engineering | 6 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 11% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 18 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2020.
All research outputs
#7,470,187
of 22,837,982 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#1,124
of 4,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,177
of 94,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,837,982 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,122 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,537 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.