↓ Skip to main content

Cooperation, Conflict, and the Evolution of Queen Pheromones

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Chemical Ecology, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
114 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
198 Mendeley
Title
Cooperation, Conflict, and the Evolution of Queen Pheromones
Published in
Journal of Chemical Ecology, November 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10886-011-0036-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah D. Kocher, Christina M. Grozinger

Abstract

While chemical communication regulates individual behavior in a wide variety of species, these communication systems are most elaborated in insect societies. In these complex systems, pheromones produced by the reproductive individuals (queens) are critical in establishing and maintaining dominant reproductive status over hundreds to thousands of workers. The proximate and ultimate mechanisms by which these intricate pheromone communication systems evolved are largely unknown, though there has been much debate over whether queen pheromones function as a control mechanism or as an honest signal facilitating cooperation. Here, we summarize results from recent studies in honey bees, bumble bees, wasps, ants and termites. We further discuss evolutionary mechanisms by which queen pheromone communication systems may have evolved. Overall, these studies suggest that queen-worker pheromone communication is a multi-component, labile dialog between the castes, rather than a simple, fixed signal-response system. We also discuss future approaches that can shed light on the proximate and ultimate mechanisms that underlie these complex systems by focusing on the development of increasingly sophisticated genomic tools and their potential applications to examine the molecular mechanisms that regulate pheromone production and perception.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
Germany 3 2%
France 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 186 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 25%
Student > Master 28 14%
Researcher 27 14%
Student > Bachelor 24 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Other 35 18%
Unknown 23 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 131 66%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 8%
Environmental Science 9 5%
Unspecified 4 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Other 11 6%
Unknown 24 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2012.
All research outputs
#13,358,186
of 22,659,164 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Chemical Ecology
#1,488
of 2,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,732
of 141,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Chemical Ecology
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,659,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,045 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.