↓ Skip to main content

“I Kiss Them Because I Love Them”: The Emergence of Heterosexual Men Kissing in British Institutes of Education

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
Title
“I Kiss Them Because I Love Them”: The Emergence of Heterosexual Men Kissing in British Institutes of Education
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, October 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10508-010-9678-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eric Anderson, Adi Adams, Ian Rivers

Abstract

In this article, we combined data from 145 interviews and three ethnographic investigations of heterosexual male students in the U.K. from multiple educational settings. Our results indicate that 89% have, at some point, kissed another male on the lips which they reported as being non-sexual: a means of expressing platonic affection among heterosexual friends. Moreover, 37% also reported engaging in sustained same-sex kissing, something they construed as non-sexual and non-homosexual. Although the students in our study understood that this type of kissing remains somewhat culturally symbolized as a taboo sexual behavior, they nonetheless reconstructed it, making it compatible with heteromasculinity by recoding it as homosocial. We hypothesize that both these types of kissing behaviors are increasingly permissible due to rapidly decreasing levels of cultural homophobia. Furthermore, we argue that there has been a loosening of the restricted physical and emotional boundaries of traditional heteromasculinity in these educational settings, something which may also gradually assist in the erosion of prevailing heterosexual hegemony.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 4%
United States 2 2%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 77 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 15%
Student > Bachelor 12 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 12%
Student > Master 8 10%
Professor 5 6%
Other 22 26%
Unknown 14 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 29 35%
Psychology 22 26%
Arts and Humanities 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 15 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2023.
All research outputs
#2,236,487
of 24,932,434 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#1,046
of 3,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,248
of 104,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#8
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,932,434 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,672 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,779 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.