↓ Skip to main content

The genetic aetiology of late-onset chronic progressive cerebellar ataxia

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The genetic aetiology of late-onset chronic progressive cerebellar ataxia
Published in
Journal of Neurology, March 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00415-009-0015-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark Wardle, Elisa Majounie, Mustapha B. Muzaimi, Nigel M. Williams, Huw R. Morris, Neil P. Robertson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 7%
Unknown 27 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 31%
Student > Bachelor 4 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 4 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 52%
Neuroscience 4 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 5 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2021.
All research outputs
#7,577,096
of 23,106,934 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#1,824
of 4,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,369
of 94,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#28
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,934 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,309 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.