| Title |
Diameters of single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) and related nanochemistry and nanobiology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers of Materials Science, December 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11706-010-0001-8 |
| Authors |
Jie Ma, Jian-Nong Wang, Chung-Jung Tsai, Ruth Nussinov, Buyong Ma |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 5 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 8 | 18% |
| Engineering | 8 | 18% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 5 | 11% |
| Materials Science | 5 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 9 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2023.
All research outputs
#3,798,945
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers of Materials Science
#2
of 53 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,628
of 173,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers of Materials Science
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 53 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,416 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them