↓ Skip to main content

Minimally Invasive Therapies for Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Current Urology Reports, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
9 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
Minimally Invasive Therapies for Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome
Published in
Current Urology Reports, May 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11934-010-0120-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Salim A. Wehbe, Jennifer Y. Fariello, Kristene Whitmore

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Israel 1 1%
Unknown 75 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Student > Master 9 12%
Researcher 8 11%
Other 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Other 17 22%
Unknown 21 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Engineering 2 3%
Chemistry 2 3%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 23 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2023.
All research outputs
#7,717,448
of 23,467,261 outputs
Outputs from Current Urology Reports
#280
of 603 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,130
of 96,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Urology Reports
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,467,261 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 603 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,802 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.