| Title |
Laser induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) as an analytical tool for the detection of metal ions in aqueous solutions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, May 1996
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s0021663550016 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
R. Knopp, F. J. Scherbaum, J. I. Kim |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 59 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 26% |
| Researcher | 12 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 13 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 19 | 31% |
| Engineering | 8 | 13% |
| Chemistry | 7 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 5% |
| Materials Science | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 16 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2018.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#2,202
of 9,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,408
of 26,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#6
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,618 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 26,598 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.