↓ Skip to main content

Efficient fuzzy full-text type-ahead search

Overview of attention for article published in The VLDB Journal, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Efficient fuzzy full-text type-ahead search
Published in
The VLDB Journal, February 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00778-011-0218-x
Authors

Guoliang Li, Shengyue Ji, Chen Li, Jianhua Feng

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Student > Master 5 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 13%
Researcher 3 10%
Professor 2 6%
Other 8 26%
Unknown 4 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 22 71%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Unspecified 1 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Unknown 5 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2020.
All research outputs
#7,863,403
of 23,842,189 outputs
Outputs from The VLDB Journal
#108
of 366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,863
of 108,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The VLDB Journal
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,842,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 366 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,909 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them