| Title |
Development of an osteoblast-based 3D continuous-perfusion microfluidic system for drug screening
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, December 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00216-007-1752-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kihoon Jang, Kae Sato, Kazuyo Igawa, Ung-il Chung, Takehiko Kitamori |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 4 | 3% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 107 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 26% |
| Researcher | 21 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 20 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 38 | 32% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 5% |
| Materials Science | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Unknown | 23 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2018.
All research outputs
#8,572,103
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#2,218
of 9,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,495
of 166,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#12
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,646 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,924 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.