↓ Skip to main content

Sequential targeting of CFTR by BAC vectors generates a novel pig model of cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Medicine, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Sequential targeting of CFTR by BAC vectors generates a novel pig model of cystic fibrosis
Published in
Journal of Molecular Medicine, December 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00109-011-0839-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

N. Klymiuk, L. Mundhenk, K. Kraehe, A. Wuensch, S. Plog, D. Emrich, M. C. Langenmayer, M. Stehr, A. Holzinger, C. Kröner, A. Richter, B. Kessler, M. Kurome, M. Eddicks, H. Nagashima, K. Heinritzi, A. D. Gruber, E. Wolf

Abstract

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is the most common lethal inherited disease in Caucasians and is caused by mutations in the CFTR gene. The disease is incurable and medical treatment is limited to the amelioration of symptoms or secondary complications. A comprehensive understanding of the disease mechanisms and the development of novel treatment options require appropriate animal models. Existing CF mouse models fail to reflect important aspects of human CF. We thus generated a CF pig model by inactivating the CFTR gene in primary porcine cells by sequential targeting using modified bacterial artificial chromosome vectors. These cells were then used to generate homozygous CFTR mutant piglets by somatic cell nuclear transfer. The homozygous CFTR mutants lack CFTR protein expression and display severe malformations in the intestine, respiratory tract, pancreas, liver, gallbladder, and male reproductive tract. These phenotypic abnormalities closely resemble both the human CF pathology as well as alterations observed in a recently published CF pig model which was generated by a different gene targeting strategy. Our new CF pig model underlines the value of the CFTR-deficient pig for gaining new insight into the disease mechanisms of CF and for the development and evaluation of new therapeutic strategies. This model will furthermore increase the availability of CF pigs to the scientific community.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 54 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 18%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Student > Master 5 9%
Other 4 7%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 9 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 13%
Engineering 3 5%
Psychology 2 4%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 13 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2021.
All research outputs
#7,168,360
of 22,659,164 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Medicine
#474
of 1,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,203
of 242,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Medicine
#6
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,659,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,547 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.