You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Consultations on driving in people with cognitive impairment in primary care: A scoping review of the evidence
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0205580 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carol Sinnott, Tony Foley, Justin Forsyth, Kathleen McLoughlin, Linda Horgan, Colin P. Bradley |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 12 | 86% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 1 | 7% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 57% |
| Scientists | 4 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 64 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 14% |
| Researcher | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 16 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 8% |
| Psychology | 5 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 17% |
| Unknown | 16 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2018.
All research outputs
#3,261,801
of 23,314,015 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#43,025
of 199,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,201
of 348,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#724
of 3,261 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,314,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199,281 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,854 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,261 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.