↓ Skip to main content

Allowance for effects of thermodynamic nonideality in sedimentation equilibrium distributions reflecting protein dimerization

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical Biochemistry, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Allowance for effects of thermodynamic nonideality in sedimentation equilibrium distributions reflecting protein dimerization
Published in
Analytical Biochemistry, December 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.ab.2011.12.010
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter R. Wills, David J. Scott, Donald J. Winzor

Abstract

This reexamination of a high-speed sedimentation equilibrium distribution for α-chymotrypsin under slightly acidic conditions (pH 4.1, I(M) 0.05) has provided experimental support for the adequacy of nearest-neighbor considerations in the allowance for effects of thermodynamic nonideality in the characterization of protein self-association over a moderate concentration range (up to 8 mg/mL). A widely held but previously untested notion about allowance for thermodynamic nonideality effects is thereby verified experimentally. However, it has also been shown that a greater obstacle to better characterization of protein self-association is likely to be the lack of a reliable estimate of monomer net charge, a parameter that has a far more profound effect on the magnitude of the measured equilibrium constant than any deficiency in current procedures for incorporating the effects of thermodynamic nonideality into the analysis of sedimentation equilibrium distributions reflecting reversible protein self-association.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 33%
Other 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%