↓ Skip to main content

Ninety-six-well planar lipid bilayer chip for ion channel recording Fabricated by hybrid stereolithography

Overview of attention for article published in Biomedical Microdevices, June 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
10 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Ninety-six-well planar lipid bilayer chip for ion channel recording Fabricated by hybrid stereolithography
Published in
Biomedical Microdevices, June 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10544-008-9205-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hiroaki Suzuki, Bruno Le Pioufle, Shoji Takeuhci

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 3%
France 2 3%
United States 2 3%
Italy 1 2%
Hungary 1 2%
Mexico 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 50 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 20%
Student > Master 8 13%
Professor 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 4 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 21 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 13%
Chemistry 6 10%
Materials Science 4 7%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 5 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2021.
All research outputs
#7,577,096
of 23,106,934 outputs
Outputs from Biomedical Microdevices
#237
of 756 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,914
of 83,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomedical Microdevices
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,934 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 756 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.