| Title |
Gender disparities in the diagnosis and treatment of non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes Large-scale observations from the CRUSADE (Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress Adverse Outcomes With Early Implementation of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines) National Quality Improvement Initiative
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, March 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.11.055 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andra L. Blomkalns, Anita Y. Chen, Judith S. Hochman, Eric D. Peterson, Kelly Trynosky, Deborah B. Diercks, Gerard X. Brogan, William E. Boden, Matthew T. Roe, E. Magnus Ohman, W. Brian Gibler, L. Kristin Newby, CRUSADE Investigators |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 198 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 8% |
| Other | 47 | 23% |
| Unknown | 55 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 100 | 50% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 11 | 5% |
| Unknown | 69 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 94. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2023.
All research outputs
#448,101
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#1,101
of 16,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#472
of 76,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#1
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,737 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,621 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.