| Title |
Humanization of critical care—psychological effects on healthcare professionals and relatives: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12630-018-1227-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Imelda M. Galvin, Jordan Leitch, Rebecca Gill, Katherine Poser, Sandra McKeown |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 6 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 13% |
| United States | 3 | 10% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Argentina | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 30% |
| Scientists | 7 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 135 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 7% |
| Researcher | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 27 | 20% |
| Unknown | 52 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 15% |
| Psychology | 11 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Unknown | 54 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2018.
All research outputs
#2,092,110
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#294
of 2,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,830
of 359,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#3
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,899 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.