| Title |
The Prevalence and Prognosis of Sarcopenic Dysphagia in Patients Who Require Dysphagia Rehabilitation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The journal of nutrition, health & aging, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12603-018-1117-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hidetaka Wakabayashi, R. Takahashi, T. Murakami |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 14% |
| Japan | 4 | 11% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 19 | 51% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 30 | 81% |
| Scientists | 5 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 106 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 10% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 15% |
| Unknown | 48 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Unknown | 53 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,722,527
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from The journal of nutrition, health & aging
#201
of 2,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,997
of 449,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The journal of nutrition, health & aging
#10
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,068 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.