| Title |
Heteroclinic Dynamics of Localized Frequency Synchrony: Heteroclinic Cycles for Small Populations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nonlinear Science, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00332-019-09552-5 |
| Authors |
Christian Bick |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 25% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 43% |
| Other | 2 | 29% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematics | 2 | 29% |
| Energy | 1 | 14% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2019.
All research outputs
#6,304,628
of 23,106,934 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nonlinear Science
#25
of 340 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,296
of 346,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nonlinear Science
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,934 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 340 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.