| Title |
Can we predict response to the McKenzie method in patients with acute low back pain? A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Spine Journal, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00586-011-2082-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Charles Sheets, Luciana A. C. Machado, Mark Hancock, Chris Maher |
| Abstract |
To evaluate whether patients' treatment preferences, characteristics, or symptomatic response to assessment moderated the effect of the McKenzie method for acute low back pain (LBP). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Poland | 1 | 20% |
| Ireland | 1 | 20% |
| Germany | 1 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 142 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 10% |
| Other | 14 | 10% |
| Other | 34 | 23% |
| Unknown | 36 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 7% |
| Sports and Recreations | 5 | 3% |
| Philosophy | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 8% |
| Unknown | 40 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2023.
All research outputs
#13,627,467
of 23,509,253 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#1,589
of 4,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,431
of 243,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#11
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,509,253 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,804 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,095 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.