↓ Skip to main content

Different uses of Bronfenbrenner’s ecological theory in public mental health research: what is their value for guiding public mental health policy and practice?

Overview of attention for article published in Social Theory & Health, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
188 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
834 Mendeley
Title
Different uses of Bronfenbrenner’s ecological theory in public mental health research: what is their value for guiding public mental health policy and practice?
Published in
Social Theory & Health, March 2018
DOI 10.1057/s41285-018-0065-6
Authors

Malin Eriksson, Mehdi Ghazinour, Anne Hammarström

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 834 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 834 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 126 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 124 15%
Student > Bachelor 67 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 57 7%
Researcher 47 6%
Other 107 13%
Unknown 306 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 187 22%
Social Sciences 134 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 59 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 38 5%
Arts and Humanities 18 2%
Other 74 9%
Unknown 324 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2021.
All research outputs
#6,967,121
of 23,298,349 outputs
Outputs from Social Theory & Health
#202
of 285 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,373
of 334,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Theory & Health
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,298,349 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 285 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,458 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.