| Title |
Ethics of neuroenhancement: A phantom debate
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BioSocieties, April 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1057/biosoc.2009.13 |
| Authors |
Boris B Quednow |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 29 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 15% |
| Researcher | 5 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 6 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 6 | 18% |
| Psychology | 6 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 12% |
| Philosophy | 4 | 12% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Unknown | 7 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,362,113
of 22,837,982 outputs
Outputs from BioSocieties
#35
of 393 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,665
of 94,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioSocieties
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,837,982 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 393 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,938 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them