↓ Skip to main content

Predicting Fracture Risk in Younger Postmenopausal Women: Comparison of the Garvan and FRAX Risk Calculators in the Women’s Health Initiative Study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Predicting Fracture Risk in Younger Postmenopausal Women: Comparison of the Garvan and FRAX Risk Calculators in the Women’s Health Initiative Study
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, October 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11606-018-4696-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carolyn J. Crandall, Joseph Larson, Andrea LaCroix, Jane A. Cauley, Meryl S. LeBoff, Wenjun Li, Erin S. LeBlanc, Beatrice J. Edwards, JoAnn E. Manson, Kristine Ensrud

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 7 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Student > Master 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 26 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 7%
Engineering 3 5%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 30 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2019.
All research outputs
#13,978,562
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#5,149
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,195
of 352,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#66
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,042 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.