↓ Skip to main content

Multicomponent fractionation of Saccharina latissima brown algae using chelating salt solutions

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Phycology, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
Title
Multicomponent fractionation of Saccharina latissima brown algae using chelating salt solutions
Published in
Journal of Applied Phycology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10811-015-0785-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin Sterner, Ulrica Edlund

Abstract

A fractionation strategy for Saccharina latissima algal biomass was developed utilizing chelating extraction salt solutions to mediate the liberation of algal components. Alginate, cellulose, laminarin, mannitol, protein, and inorganic salts were quantified in the fractions to reveal their individual dissolution patterns. Chelation power was identified as a key parameter for liberating alginate and increasing the yield of extracted components. The most efficient fractionation was achieved using aqueous sodium citrate as the extraction solution, producing an alginate-rich soluble fraction and a salt-poor insoluble fraction rich in cellulose and protein. Extractions at decreased pH were shown to be beneficial because they decreased the M/G ratio of the extracted alginate and concentrated the protein in the insoluble fraction from which it can easily be recovered; these effects could be achieved by switching the traditional sodium carbonate extraction solution with salts that have chelation capacity at lower pH. A cyclic extraction demonstrated that the sodium citrate solution can be reused for multiple alginate extractions with the buildup of the concentrations of other valuable components in the solution.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 1%
Unknown 85 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 15%
Student > Bachelor 12 14%
Researcher 12 14%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 20 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 27%
Chemistry 11 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 12%
Engineering 6 7%
Environmental Science 3 3%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 23 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2023.
All research outputs
#8,216,327
of 25,323,244 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Phycology
#470
of 2,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,752
of 408,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Phycology
#4
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,323,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,621 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 408,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.