| Title |
Understanding spatial transformations: similarities and differences between mental rotation and mental folding
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cognitive Processing, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10339-013-0544-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Justin Harris, Kathy Hirsh-Pasek, Nora S. Newcombe |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 148 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 12% |
| Researcher | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 26 | 17% |
| Unknown | 28 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 64 | 42% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 14% |
| Unknown | 37 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2016.
All research outputs
#7,470,187
of 22,837,982 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Processing
#105
of 337 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,357
of 286,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Processing
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,837,982 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 337 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,051 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them