↓ Skip to main content

Re-examining the Nature and Function of Self-Reactive T cells

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Immunology, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Re-examining the Nature and Function of Self-Reactive T cells
Published in
Trends in Immunology, January 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.it.2015.12.005
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Recent studies have leveraged MHC tetramer and TCR sequencing approaches towards a more precise characterization of the peripheral T cell repertoire, providing important insight into both the contribution of self-reactive T cells to the overall repertoire and their function. The peripheral T cell repertoire of healthy individuals contains a high frequency of diverse, self-reactive T cells. Furthermore, self-reactive T cells can perform essential beneficial physiological functions. We review these recent findings here, and discuss their implications to the current understanding of peripheral tolerance and the role of self-reactive T cells in autoimmune disease. We outline gaps in understanding, and argue that an important step forward is to revise the definition of self-reactive T cells to incorporate new concepts regarding the nature and physiological functions of different populations of T cells capable of recognizing self-antigens.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Unknown 173 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 25%
Researcher 32 18%
Student > Master 20 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 9 5%
Other 27 15%
Unknown 34 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 44 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 11%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Other 11 6%
Unknown 34 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2023.
All research outputs
#7,112,822
of 33,982,974 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Immunology
#1,094
of 2,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,160
of 449,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Immunology
#12
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,982,974 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,183 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,137 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.