↓ Skip to main content

Four commentaries on the use of students and professionals in empirical software engineering experiments

Overview of attention for article published in Empirical Software Engineering, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Four commentaries on the use of students and professionals in empirical software engineering experiments
Published in
Empirical Software Engineering, November 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10664-018-9655-0
Authors

Robert Feldt, Thomas Zimmermann, Gunnar R. Bergersen, Davide Falessi, Andreas Jedlitschka, Natalia Juristo, Jürgen Münch, Markku Oivo, Per Runeson, Martin Shepperd, Dag I. K. Sjøberg, Burak Turhan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Researcher 4 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 9%
Professor 3 7%
Other 3 7%
Other 10 23%
Unknown 16 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 25 57%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 2%
Engineering 1 2%
Unknown 17 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2019.
All research outputs
#6,674,480
of 24,002,307 outputs
Outputs from Empirical Software Engineering
#193
of 734 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,451
of 444,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Empirical Software Engineering
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,002,307 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 734 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.