↓ Skip to main content

Stock-plant etiolation causes drifts in total soluble sugars and anthraquinones, and promotes adventitious root formation in teak (Tectona grandis L. f.) coppice shoots

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Growth Regulation, September 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Stock-plant etiolation causes drifts in total soluble sugars and anthraquinones, and promotes adventitious root formation in teak (Tectona grandis L. f.) coppice shoots
Published in
Plant Growth Regulation, September 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10725-007-9222-y
Authors

Azamal Husen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Czechia 1 3%
Unknown 29 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 20%
Researcher 6 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 6 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 57%
Environmental Science 4 13%
Engineering 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Unknown 6 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2016.
All research outputs
#15,353,264
of 22,837,982 outputs
Outputs from Plant Growth Regulation
#231
of 341 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,164
of 70,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Growth Regulation
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,837,982 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 341 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,114 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.