↓ Skip to main content

Professional stress in anesthesiology: a review

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
Title
Professional stress in anesthesiology: a review
Published in
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, December 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10877-011-9328-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gabriel M. Gurman, Moti Klein, Nathan Weksler

Abstract

Anesthesiology is a stressful medical profession. While anesthesia in particular has become safer for the patient in the last decades, anesthesiology as a profession represents a medical field in which the professionals are permanently tense. The various reasons for this situation include the fact that anesthesiology is a team profession that requires perfect cooperation with other specialists. It also entails great responsibility for the patient's life, the daily use of "blind" invasive techniques, and last but not least the production pressure that characterizes the activity in the operating room. There are various methods to quantify professional stress and this article emphasizes the place of measurement of salivary cortisol in order to identify those stressful moments that are part of the anesthesiologist's routine activity, in addition to those individuals who are more prone to develop negative aspects of stress. It seems that there is a strong correlation between the high level of salivary cortisol and stressful events during patient management and also a correlation between this level and a high score of implicit job-stress. This reality created the need to look for remedies; some authors recommend a long list of measures to be taken in order to prevent or reduce the magnitude of professional stress. This list includes a continuous self-care attitude, consisting of having a balanced professional and personal life; adequate sleep; avoiding drugs, obesity, and "workaholic" behavior; as well as better use of leisure. Finally, more studies are needed to find out which preventive means may potentially reduce the risk of professional stress among anesthesiologists.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 118 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 12%
Student > Master 15 12%
Other 13 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 7%
Other 30 25%
Unknown 29 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 39%
Psychology 8 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 35 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2019.
All research outputs
#15,239,825
of 22,659,164 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
#396
of 657 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,693
of 226,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
#7
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,659,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 657 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,109 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.