You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Predicting the consequences of species loss using size‐structured biodiversity approaches
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Reviews, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1111/brv.12250 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ulrich Brose, Julia L. Blanchard, Anna Eklöf, Nuria Galiana, Martin Hartvig, Myriam R. Hirt, Gregor Kalinkat, Marie C. Nordström, Eoin J. O'Gorman, Björn C. Rall, Florian D. Schneider, Elisa Thébault, Ute Jacob |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 5 | 23% |
| United States | 2 | 9% |
| France | 2 | 9% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
| Chile | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 11 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 11 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 304 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 297 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 82 | 27% |
| Researcher | 61 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 10% |
| Professor | 14 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 47 | 15% |
| Unknown | 56 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 132 | 43% |
| Environmental Science | 78 | 26% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | <1% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 3% |
| Unknown | 73 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2018.
All research outputs
#3,040,823
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Biological Reviews
#627
of 1,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,077
of 407,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Reviews
#8
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,611 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 407,475 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.