| Title |
Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) vs. conventional multiport cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Surgical Endoscopy, December 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00464-011-2051-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
S. R. Markar, A. Karthikesalingam, S. Thrumurthy, L. Muirhead, J. Kinross, P. Paraskeva |
| Abstract |
Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) has gained increasing attention due to the potential to maximize the benefits of laparoscopic surgery. The aim of this systematic review and pooled analysis was to compare clinical outcome following SILS and standard multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the treatment of gallstone-related disease. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Russia | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 74 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 19 | 25% |
| Unknown | 16 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 56% |
| Engineering | 5 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 17 | 22% |