↓ Skip to main content

Ethical Purchasing Dissonance: Antecedents and Coping Behaviors

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Business Ethics, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Ethical Purchasing Dissonance: Antecedents and Coping Behaviors
Published in
Journal of Business Ethics, October 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10551-018-4039-3
Authors

Tim Reilly, Amit Saini, Jenifer Skiba

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 22%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 12%
Student > Master 4 7%
Lecturer 3 5%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 19 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 13 22%
Psychology 7 12%
Social Sciences 6 10%
Engineering 4 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 5%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 23 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2018.
All research outputs
#18,652,089
of 23,106,934 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#2,574
of 2,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266,841
of 348,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#45
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,934 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,957 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,576 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.