↓ Skip to main content

Developing and assessing the utility of a You-Tube based clinical genetics video channel for families affected by inherited tumours

Overview of attention for article published in Familial Cancer, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
Title
Developing and assessing the utility of a You-Tube based clinical genetics video channel for families affected by inherited tumours
Published in
Familial Cancer, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10689-016-9866-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

G. E. Jones, J. H. Singletary, A. Cashmore, V. Jain, J. Abhulimhen, J. Chauhan, H. V. Musson, J. G. Barwell

Abstract

We have designed and implemented the first worldwide You Tube channel with 22 videos covering common questions asked in familial cancer susceptibility clinics. We discuss the use of the videos including demographics of registered You Tube users, and what lessons have been learnt about how the general public uses medical information online. The most popular video on inheritance patterns has been watched on average 84 times per month. The mostly highly viewed videos include inheritance patterns, breast cancer screening and hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer. Registered viewers were more commonly male and the average age of the registered user was 45-54 years; similar to that seen in Genetics Clinics suggesting that age may not be a major barrier to access to this type of information for patients. The videos have been viewed in more than 140 countries confirming that there is clearly an audience for this type of information. Patient feedback questionnaires indicate that these videos provide a useful aide memoir for the clinic appointment, and most people would recommend them to others. In summary, You Tube videos are easy and cost effective to make. They have the ability to disseminate genetics education to a worldwide audience and may be a useful adjunct to clinical appointments.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 53 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 28%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 6%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 11 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 26%
Social Sciences 6 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Psychology 4 7%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 14 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2016.
All research outputs
#14,182,150
of 22,837,982 outputs
Outputs from Familial Cancer
#292
of 558 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,207
of 394,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Familial Cancer
#13
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,837,982 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 558 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.