↓ Skip to main content

Enhanced genome editing in mammalian cells with a modified dual-fluorescent surrogate system

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
Title
Enhanced genome editing in mammalian cells with a modified dual-fluorescent surrogate system
Published in
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00018-015-2128-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yan Zhou, Yong Liu, Dianna Hussmann, Peter Brøgger, Rasha Abdelkadhem Al-Saaidi, Shuang Tan, Lin Lin, Trine Skov Petersen, Guang Qian Zhou, Peter Bross, Lars Aagaard, Tino Klein, Sif Groth Rønn, Henrik Duelund Pedersen, Lars Bolund, Anders Lade Nielsen, Charlotte Brandt Sørensen, Yonglun Luo

Abstract

Programmable DNA nucleases such as TALENs and CRISPR/Cas9 are emerging as powerful tools for genome editing. Dual-fluorescent surrogate systems have been demonstrated by several studies to recapitulate DNA nuclease activity and enrich for genetically edited cells. In this study, we created a single-strand annealing-directed, dual-fluorescent surrogate reporter system, referred to as C-Check. We opted for the Golden Gate Cloning strategy to simplify C-Check construction. To demonstrate the utility of the C-Check system, we used the C-Check in combination with TALENs or CRISPR/Cas9 in different scenarios of gene editing experiments. First, we disrupted the endogenous pIAPP gene (3.0 % efficiency) by C-Check-validated TALENs in primary porcine fibroblasts (PPFs). Next, we achieved gene-editing efficiencies of 9.0-20.3 and 4.9 % when performing single- and double-gene targeting (MAPT and SORL1), respectively, in PPFs using C-Check-validated CRISPR/Cas9 vectors. Third, fluorescent tagging of endogenous genes (MYH6 and COL2A1, up to 10.0 % frequency) was achieved in human fibroblasts with C-Check-validated CRISPR/Cas9 vectors. We further demonstrated that the C-Check system could be applied to enrich for IGF1R null HEK293T cells and CBX5 null MCF-7 cells with frequencies of nearly 100.0 and 86.9 %, respectively. Most importantly, we further showed that the C-Check system is compatible with multiplexing and for studying CRISPR/Cas9 sgRNA specificity. The C-Check system may serve as an alternative dual-fluorescent surrogate tool for measuring DNA nuclease activity and enrichment of gene-edited cells, and may thereby aid in streamlining programmable DNA nuclease-mediated genome editing and biological research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Unknown 78 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 20%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 8%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 14 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 29%
Neuroscience 5 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 16 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2023.
All research outputs
#7,028,888
of 25,381,864 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#1,755
of 5,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,217
of 407,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#19
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,381,864 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,708 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 407,062 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.