| Title |
Development of community of practice to support quantitative risk assessment for synthetic biology products: contaminant bioremediation and invasive carp control as cases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environment Systems and Decisions, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10669-018-9710-9 |
| Authors |
Benjamin D. Trump, Christy Foran, Taylor Rycroft, Matthew D. Wood, Nirzwan Bandolin, Mariana Cains, Timothy Cary, Fiona Crocker, Nicholas A. Friedenberg, Patrick Gurian, Kerry Hamilton, Jan Jeffrey Hoover, Corey Meyer, Kaytee Pokrzywinski, Ryan Ritterson, Paul Schulte, Christopher Warner, Edward Perkins, Igor Linkov |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Singapore | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 18% |
| Researcher | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 14% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 7 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 4 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 9% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2018.
All research outputs
#8,094,656
of 24,292,134 outputs
Outputs from Environment Systems and Decisions
#106
of 200 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,424
of 350,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environment Systems and Decisions
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,292,134 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 200 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.