↓ Skip to main content

An on-site versus a household survey approach to modelling the demand for recreational angling: Do welfare estimates differ?

Overview of attention for article published in Ecosystem Services, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An on-site versus a household survey approach to modelling the demand for recreational angling: Do welfare estimates differ?
Published in
Ecosystem Services, December 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.10.013
Authors

Stephen Hynes, Paul O’Reilly, Rebecca Corless

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
Unknown 40 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 30%
Researcher 8 19%
Student > Master 7 16%
Professor 2 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 5 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 13 30%
Environmental Science 9 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 9 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2018.
All research outputs
#7,577,096
of 23,106,934 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystem Services
#599
of 993 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,171
of 389,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystem Services
#18
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,934 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 993 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 389,002 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.