↓ Skip to main content

A Military-Specific Injury Scoring System to Aid in Understanding the Golden Hour

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Surgery, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Military-Specific Injury Scoring System to Aid in Understanding the Golden Hour
Published in
JAMA Surgery, May 2016
DOI 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.4915
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael C. Reade

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 50%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Librarian 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2016.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Surgery
#5,567
of 5,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,271
of 311,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Surgery
#77
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,791 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,866 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.