↓ Skip to main content

VX-659–Tezacaftor–Ivacaftor in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis and One or Two Phe508del Alleles

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
14 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
160 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
284 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
280 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
VX-659–Tezacaftor–Ivacaftor in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis and One or Two Phe508del Alleles
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, October 2018
DOI 10.1056/nejmoa1807119
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jane C Davies, Samuel M Moskowitz, Cynthia Brown, Alexander Horsley, Marcus A Mall, Edward F McKone, Barry J Plant, Dario Prais, Bonnie W Ramsey, Jennifer L Taylor-Cousar, Elizabeth Tullis, Ahmet Uluer, Charlotte M McKee, Sarah Robertson, Rebecca A Shilling, Christopher Simard, Fredrick Van Goor, David Waltz, Fengjuan Xuan, Tim Young, Steven M Rowe

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 160 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 280 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 280 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 38 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 11%
Student > Master 30 11%
Student > Bachelor 27 10%
Other 20 7%
Other 43 15%
Unknown 90 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 42 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 3%
Other 28 10%
Unknown 109 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 211. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2023.
All research outputs
#186,083
of 25,611,630 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#3,723
of 32,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,707
of 360,456 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#104
of 290 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,611,630 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,565 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,456 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 290 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.